PairBook
HomeHSTM › HSTM vs RGC

HSTM vs RGC: Correlation

How closely do HealthStream, Inc. (HSTM) and Regencell Bioscience Holdings Limited (RGC) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.35, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.35
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.24
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.25
long-run
Ann. covariance
-4214.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are HSTM and RGC?

On 3 years of weekly data the HSTM/RGC correlation comes out at -0.35, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.24) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.35). The 5-year figure is -0.25, and annualized covariance runs at -4214.9 %².

RGC is close to the least connected end of HSTM's tracked universe, ranking #12 of 13. The last year tells two different stories: HSTM led by 63.4 percentage points, +2.2% for HSTM against -61.2% for RGC. Risk is not evenly split, since RGC carries 16.1 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

HSTM vs RGC: side by side

HSTM (HealthStream, Inc.)RGC (Regencell Bioscience Holdings Limited)
1-year return+2.2%-61.2%
5-year return-1.6%+626.3%
Volatility (ann.)27.4%441.0%
Beta vs S&P 5000.54-2.00
Max drawdown (3Y)-41.4%-93.9%
Market cap$0.8B
P/E (trailing)40.0
Dividend yield0.46%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: HSTM 0.46% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: HSTM -41.4% vs -93.9%Higher 5y return: RGC +626.3% vs -1.6%
-62%0%+245%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. HSTM · RGC

Year-by-year returns

YearHSTMRGC
2022-5.8%-12.4%
2023+9.3%-62.4%
2024+18.1%-53.0%
2025-27.1%+16053.8%
2026+25.5%-73.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are HSTM and RGC good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.35, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between HSTM and RGC?

The HSTM/RGC correlation stands at -0.35 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.24, 5 years: -0.25), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is RGC a good diversifier for HSTM?

Yes: at -0.35, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.35 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.35 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/hstm-vs-rgc.json

HSTM vs RGC: 3-year weekly correlation -0.35HSTM vs RGC-0.35

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![HSTM vs RGC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/hstm-vs-rgc.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/hstm-vs-rgc/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: HSTM correlations · RGC correlations