PairBook
HomeHR › HR vs KIM

HR vs KIM: Correlation

Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated (HR) and Kimco Realty (KIM) show a strong relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.62.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.62
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.70
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.53
long-run
Ann. covariance
311.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are HR and KIM?

Over the past 3 years, HR and KIM moved with a correlation of 0.62, which is strong. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.70 over 1 year against 0.62 over 3. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.53, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 311.6 %².

Within HR's tracked universe of 11 assets, KIM comes in at #5 by 3-year correlation. The trailing year gives HR the advantage: +16.6% versus +11.4%, a 5.2-point spread.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

HR vs KIM: side by side

HR (Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated)KIM (Kimco Realty)
1-year return+16.6%+11.4%
5-year return+12.6%+35.9%
Volatility (ann.)21.8%22.9%
Beta vs S&P 5000.370.63
Max drawdown (3Y)-24.4%-25.9%
Market cap$6.6B$16.0B
P/E (trailing)28.0
Dividend yield4.98%4.29%
Sector / categoryUS ListedReal Estate
Higher yield: HR 4.98% vs 4.29%Smaller drawdown: HR -24.4% vs -25.9%Higher 5y return: KIM +35.9% vs +12.6%
-11%0%+23%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). HR · KIM

Year-by-year returns

YearHRKIM
2022-17.5%-10.8%
2023-4.1%+6.1%
2024+6.4%+15.0%
2025+6.9%-9.3%
2026+17.2%+20.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are HR and KIM good diversifiers for each other?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.62 means HR and KIM share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

FAQ

What is the correlation between HR and KIM?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.62 over 3 years, with 0.70 over the last year and 0.53 over 5 years.

Is KIM a good diversifier for HR?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.62 means HR and KIM share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

What does a correlation of 0.62 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.62 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/hr-vs-kim.json

HR vs KIM: 3-year weekly correlation 0.62HR vs KIM0.62

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![HR vs KIM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/hr-vs-kim.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/hr-vs-kim/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: HR correlations · KIM correlations