PairBook
HomeHOOD › HOOD vs SANG

HOOD vs SANG: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Robinhood Markets (HOOD) and Sangoma Technologies Corporation (SANG) carry a correlation of 0.37, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.37
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.37
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.32
long-run
Ann. covariance
1132.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are HOOD and SANG?

Over the past 3 years, HOOD and SANG moved with a correlation of 0.37, which is moderate. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.37 over 1 year against 0.37 over 3. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.32, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 1132.2 %².

Within HOOD's tracked universe of 39 assets, SANG comes in at #29 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: HOOD led by 42.5 percentage points, +6.6% for HOOD against -35.9% for SANG. One caveat on sizing: HOOD is 1.7 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

HOOD vs SANG: side by side

HOOD (Robinhood Markets)SANG (Sangoma Technologies Corporation)
1-year return+6.6%-35.9%
5-year return+151.5%-78.8%
Volatility (ann.)71.4%42.3%
Beta vs S&P 5002.880.77
Max drawdown (3Y)-57.3%-55.6%
Market cap$98.7B$0.1B
P/E (trailing)48.1
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryFinancialsUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: SANG -55.6% vs -57.3%Higher 5y return: HOOD +151.5% vs -78.8%
-36%0%+47%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. HOOD · SANG

Year-by-year returns

YearHOODSANG
2022-54.2%-71.2%
2023+56.5%-34.0%
2024+192.5%+123.1%
2025+203.5%-29.0%
2026-3.0%-25.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are HOOD and SANG good diversifiers for each other?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.37 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between HOOD and SANG?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.37 over 3 years, with 0.37 over the last year and 0.32 over 5 years.

Is SANG a good diversifier for HOOD?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.37 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.37 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/hood-vs-sang.json

HOOD vs SANG: 3-year weekly correlation 0.37HOOD vs SANG0.37

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![HOOD vs SANG correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/hood-vs-sang.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/hood-vs-sang/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: HOOD correlations · SANG correlations