PairBook
HomeHOLO › HOLO vs SNA

HOLO vs SNA: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, MicroCloud Hologram Inc. (HOLO) and Snap-on (SNA) carry a correlation of -0.26, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.26
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.13
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.18
long-run
Ann. covariance
-3634.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are HOLO and SNA?

On 3 years of weekly data the HOLO/SNA correlation comes out at -0.26, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at 0.13 versus -0.26 over 3 years. The 5-year figure is -0.18, and annualized covariance runs at -3634.3 %².

By 3-year correlation, SNA places #20 of the 27 assets tracked against HOLO. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months SNA outperformed by 82.7 percentage points (-59.6% for HOLO against +23.1% for SNA). Note the risk asymmetry: HOLO runs 30.4 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

HOLO vs SNA: side by side

HOLO (MicroCloud Hologram Inc.)SNA (Snap-on)
1-year return-59.6%+23.1%
5-year return-100.0%+99.6%
Volatility (ann.)648.5%21.3%
Beta vs S&P 5003.020.70
Max drawdown (3Y)-100.0%-20.8%
Market cap$20.5B
P/E (trailing)20.2
Dividend yield0.00%2.38%
Sector / categoryUS ListedIndustrials
Higher yield: SNA 2.38% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: SNA -20.8% vs -100.0%Higher 5y return: SNA +99.6% vs -100.0%
-67%0%+29%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. HOLO · SNA

Year-by-year returns

YearHOLOSNA
2022-77.2%+8.9%
2023-84.4%+29.7%
2024-93.1%+20.7%
2025-98.7%+4.3%
2026-28.4%+17.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are HOLO and SNA good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.26, HOLO and SNA have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between HOLO and SNA?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between HOLO and SNA is -0.26 over 3 years, 0.13 over 1 year and -0.18 over 5 years.

Is SNA a good diversifier for HOLO?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.26, HOLO and SNA have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.26 mean?

A reading of -0.26 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/holo-vs-sna.json

HOLO vs SNA: 3-year weekly correlation -0.26HOLO vs SNA-0.26

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![HOLO vs SNA correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/holo-vs-sna.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/holo-vs-sna/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: HOLO correlations · SNA correlations