HNVR vs VXZ: Correlation
Hanover Bancorp, Inc. (HNVR) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.34.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are HNVR and VXZ?
On 3 years of weekly data the HNVR/VXZ correlation comes out at -0.34, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (-0.24) than the 3-year average (-0.34). The 5-year figure is -0.26, and annualized covariance runs at -238.4 %².
Among the 13 assets we track against HNVR, VXZ sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #13. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months HNVR outperformed by 39.1 percentage points (+23.0% for HNVR against -16.1% for VXZ).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
HNVR vs VXZ: side by side
| HNVR (Hanover Bancorp, Inc.) | VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +23.0% | -16.1% |
| 5-year return | +40.1% | -53.1% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 27.1% | 25.6% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.50 | -1.31 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -28.2% | -36.4% |
| Market cap | $0.2B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 21.3 | – |
| Dividend yield | 1.48% | – |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | HNVR | VXZ |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | – | +0.5% |
| 2023 | -11.6% | -44.0% |
| 2024 | +33.7% | -12.7% |
| 2025 | +2.0% | +5.7% |
| 2026 | +18.5% | -10.5% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are HNVR and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?
Yes: at -0.34, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
FAQ
What is the correlation between HNVR and VXZ?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.34 over 3 years, with -0.24 over the last year and -0.26 over 5 years.
Is VXZ a good diversifier for HNVR?
Yes: at -0.34, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
What does a correlation of -0.34 mean?
A reading of -0.34 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/hnvr-vs-vxz.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/hnvr-vs-vxz/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: HNVR correlations · VXZ correlations
