PairBook
HomeHMN › HMN vs L

HMN vs L: Correlation

How closely do Horace Mann Educators Corporation (HMN) and Loews Corporation (L) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.62, which is strong.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.62
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.60
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.57
long-run
Ann. covariance
206.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are HMN and L?

On 3 years of weekly data the HMN/L correlation comes out at 0.62, strong. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.60) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is 0.57, and annualized covariance runs at 206.5 %².

Few assets follow HMN as closely as L, which ranks #2 of 11 tracked partners. Twelve-month performance is nearly a tie, at +15.9% for HMN and +14.2% for L.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

HMN vs L: side by side

HMN (Horace Mann Educators Corporation)L (Loews Corporation)
1-year return+15.9%+14.2%
5-year return+48.6%+100.1%
Volatility (ann.)20.0%16.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.260.33
Max drawdown (3Y)-17.1%-12.2%
Market cap$2.1B$22.5B
P/E (trailing)12.013.5
Dividend yield2.76%0.23%
Sector / categoryUS ListedFinancials
Lower P/E: HMN 12.0 vs 13.5Higher yield: HMN 2.76% vs 0.23%Smaller drawdown: L -12.2% vs -17.1%Higher 5y return: L +100.1% vs +48.6%
-8%0%+22%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. HMN · L

Year-by-year returns

YearHMNL
2022-0.1%+1.4%
2023-8.8%+19.8%
2024+24.6%+22.1%
2025+21.5%+24.7%
2026+12.5%+4.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are HMN and L good diversifiers for each other?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.62 means HMN and L share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

FAQ

What is the correlation between HMN and L?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.62 over 3 years, with 0.60 over the last year and 0.57 over 5 years.

Is L a good diversifier for HMN?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.62 means HMN and L share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

What does a correlation of 0.62 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/hmn-vs-l.json

HMN vs L: 3-year weekly correlation 0.62HMN vs L0.62

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![HMN vs L correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/hmn-vs-l.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/hmn-vs-l/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: HMN correlations · L correlations