PairBook
HomeHLT › HLT vs XLF

HLT vs XLF: Correlation

Hilton Worldwide (HLT) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) show a strong relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.63.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.63
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.44
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.63
long-run
Ann. covariance
210.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are HLT and XLF?

On 3 years of weekly data the HLT/XLF correlation comes out at 0.63, strong. The past 12 months show a weaker link (0.44) than the 3-year average (0.63). The 5-year figure is 0.63, and annualized covariance runs at 210.4 %².

Within HLT's tracked universe of 40 assets, XLF comes in at #7 by 3-year correlation. Over the last 12 months HLT came out ahead by 8.8 percentage points (+18.1% against +9.3%). The rolling one-year correlation moved between 0.45 and 0.77 over the past three years, a moderate range.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
One-year correlation, rolled weekly across the last three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

HLT vs XLF: side by side

HLT (Hilton Worldwide)XLF (Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund)
1-year return+18.1%+9.3%
5-year return+162.7%+64.2%
Volatility (ann.)20.7%16.2%
Beta vs S&P 5000.850.84
Max drawdown (3Y)-26.4%-15.5%
Market cap$73.3B
P/E (trailing)47.8
Dividend yield0.18%1.42%
Expense ratio0.08%
Assets under management$57.9B
Sector / categoryConsumer DiscretionarySector ETF
Higher yield: XLF 1.42% vs 0.18%Smaller drawdown: XLF -15.5% vs -26.4%Higher 5y return: HLT +162.7% vs +64.2%

XLF is a Financial fund from State Street Investment Management: $57.9B under management, 77 holdings, a 0.08% expense ratio, a 1.42% trailing dividend yield.

-9%0%+28%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). HLT · XLF

Year-by-year returns

YearHLTXLF
2022-18.7%-10.6%
2023+44.7%+12.0%
2024+36.1%+30.6%
2025+16.5%+14.9%
2026+13.5%+6.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are HLT and XLF good diversifiers for each other?

Somewhat, no more. With 0.63 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.

FAQ

What is the correlation between HLT and XLF?

The HLT/XLF correlation stands at 0.63 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.44, 5 years: 0.63), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is XLF a good diversifier for HLT?

Somewhat, no more. With 0.63 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.

What does a correlation of 0.63 mean?

A reading of 0.63 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/hlt-vs-xlf.json

HLT vs XLF: 3-year weekly correlation 0.63HLT vs XLF0.63

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![HLT vs XLF correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/hlt-vs-xlf.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/hlt-vs-xlf/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: HLT correlations · XLF correlations