PairBook
HomeHLT › HLT vs NCLH

HLT vs NCLH: Correlation

How closely do Hilton Worldwide (HLT) and Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings (NCLH) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.46, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.46
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.31
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.56
long-run
Ann. covariance
478.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are HLT and NCLH?

On 3 years of weekly data the HLT/NCLH correlation comes out at 0.46, moderate. The past 12 months show a weaker link (0.31) than the 3-year average (0.46). The 5-year figure is 0.56, and annualized covariance runs at 478.1 %².

Among the 40 assets we track against HLT, NCLH ranks #25 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with HLT ahead by 51.2 points (+18.1% versus -33.1%). The rolling one-year correlation moved between 0.29 and 0.68 over the past three years, a moderate range. One caveat on sizing: NCLH is 2.4 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
Rolling one-year correlation of weekly returns over the past three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

HLT vs NCLH: side by side

HLT (Hilton Worldwide)NCLH (Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings)
1-year return+18.1%-33.1%
5-year return+162.7%-34.4%
Volatility (ann.)20.7%49.9%
Beta vs S&P 5000.851.52
Max drawdown (3Y)-26.4%-49.1%
Market cap$73.3B$7.6B
P/E (trailing)47.810.1
Dividend yield0.18%0.00%
Sector / categoryConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
Lower P/E: NCLH 10.1 vs 47.8Higher yield: HLT 0.18% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: HLT -26.4% vs -49.1%Higher 5y return: HLT +162.7% vs -34.4%
-40%0%+28%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. HLT · NCLH

Year-by-year returns

YearHLTNCLH
2022-18.7%-41.0%
2023+44.7%+63.7%
2024+36.1%+28.4%
2025+16.5%-13.3%
2026+13.5%-25.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are HLT and NCLH good diversifiers for each other?

Reasonably. At 0.46, HLT and NCLH keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between HLT and NCLH?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.46 over 3 years, with 0.31 over the last year and 0.56 over 5 years.

Is NCLH a good diversifier for HLT?

Reasonably. At 0.46, HLT and NCLH keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.46 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.46 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/hlt-vs-nclh.json

HLT vs NCLH: 3-year weekly correlation 0.46HLT vs NCLH0.46

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![HLT vs NCLH correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/hlt-vs-nclh.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/hlt-vs-nclh/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: HLT correlations · NCLH correlations