PairBook
HomeHLT › HLT vs LICN

HLT vs LICN: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Hilton Worldwide (HLT) and Lichen International Limited - Class A (LICN) carry a correlation of -0.20, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.20
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.08
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-35745.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are HLT and LICN?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of HLT and LICN correlate at -0.20, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.08) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.20). Stretching to 5 years gives n/a, with an annualized covariance of -35745.6 %².

Among the 40 assets we track against HLT, LICN ranks #32 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: HLT led by 92.8 percentage points, +18.1% for HLT against -74.7% for LICN. One caveat on sizing: LICN is 412.0 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

HLT vs LICN: side by side

HLT (Hilton Worldwide)LICN (Lichen International Limited - Class A)
1-year return+18.1%-74.7%
5-year return+162.7%n/a
Volatility (ann.)20.7%8528.0%
Beta vs S&P 5000.85-80.22
Max drawdown (3Y)-26.4%-98.4%
Market cap$73.3B
P/E (trailing)47.8
Dividend yield0.18%0.00%
Sector / categoryConsumer DiscretionaryUS Listed
Higher yield: HLT 0.18% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: HLT -26.4% vs -98.4%
-81%0%+61%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). HLT · LICN

Year-by-year returns

YearHLTLICN
2022-18.7%
2023+44.7%
2024+36.1%-91.0%
2025+16.5%+1484.3%
2026+13.5%-56.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are HLT and LICN good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.20, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between HLT and LICN?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between HLT and LICN is -0.20 over 3 years, 0.08 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.

Is LICN a good diversifier for HLT?

Yes: at -0.20, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.20 mean?

A reading of -0.20 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/hlt-vs-licn.json

HLT vs LICN: 3-year weekly correlation -0.20HLT vs LICN-0.20

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![HLT vs LICN correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/hlt-vs-licn.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/hlt-vs-licn/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: HLT correlations · LICN correlations