PairBook
HomeHL › HL vs HYMC

HL vs HYMC: Correlation

Hecla Mining Company (HL) and Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) show a strong relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.66.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.66
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.71
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.21
long-run
Ann. covariance
4241.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are HL and HYMC?

On 3 years of weekly data the HL/HYMC correlation comes out at 0.66, strong. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.71 over 1 year against 0.66 over 3. The 5-year figure is 0.21, and annualized covariance runs at 4241.8 %².

Among the 16 assets we track against HL, HYMC ranks #9 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: HYMC led by 355.4 percentage points, +167.1% for HL against +522.5% for HYMC.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

HL vs HYMC: side by side

HL (Hecla Mining Company)HYMC (Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation)
1-year return+167.1%+522.5%
5-year return+265.0%+28.5%
Volatility (ann.)66.9%96.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.500.99
Max drawdown (3Y)-55.8%-66.9%
Market cap$14.4B$2.4B
P/E (trailing)24.9
Dividend yield0.07%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: HL 0.07% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: HL -55.8% vs -66.9%Higher 5y return: HL +265.0% vs +28.5%
0%+821%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. HL · HYMC

Year-by-year returns

YearHLHYMC
2022+7.0%-13.4%
2023-13.0%-53.9%
2024+2.8%-9.8%
2025+291.8%+975.6%
2026+11.7%+9.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are HL and HYMC good diversifiers for each other?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.66 means HL and HYMC share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

FAQ

What is the correlation between HL and HYMC?

The HL/HYMC correlation stands at 0.66 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.71, 5 years: 0.21), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is HYMC a good diversifier for HL?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.66 means HL and HYMC share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

What does a correlation of 0.66 mean?

A reading of 0.66 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/hl-vs-hymc.json

HL vs HYMC: 3-year weekly correlation 0.66HL vs HYMC0.66

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![HL vs HYMC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/hl-vs-hymc.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/hl-vs-hymc/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: HL correlations · HYMC correlations