PairBook
HomeHIG › HIG vs RMCF

HIG vs RMCF: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Hartford (The) (HIG) and Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc. (RMCF) carry a correlation of -0.21, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.21
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.31
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.13
long-run
Ann. covariance
-285.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are HIG and RMCF?

On 3 years of weekly data the HIG/RMCF correlation comes out at -0.21, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.31 over 1 year against -0.21 over 3. The 5-year figure is -0.13, and annualized covariance runs at -285.5 %².

Within HIG's tracked universe of 49 assets, RMCF comes in at #42 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: HIG led by 25.3 percentage points, +5.4% for HIG against -19.9% for RMCF. One caveat on sizing: RMCF is 3.5 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

HIG vs RMCF: side by side

HIG (Hartford (The))RMCF (Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Inc.)
1-year return+5.4%-19.9%
5-year return+127.4%-84.3%
Volatility (ann.)19.5%68.5%
Beta vs S&P 5000.390.77
Max drawdown (3Y)-13.7%-87.0%
Market cap$37.3B
P/E (trailing)9.7
Dividend yield1.66%0.00%
Sector / categoryFinancialsUS Listed
Higher yield: HIG 1.66% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: HIG -13.7% vs -87.0%Higher 5y return: HIG +127.4% vs -84.3%
-46%0%+79%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. HIG · RMCF

Year-by-year returns

YearHIGRMCF
2022+12.3%-27.4%
2023+8.5%-19.3%
2024+38.5%-47.2%
2025+28.1%-21.8%
2026+0.9%-38.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are HIG and RMCF good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.21 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between HIG and RMCF?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between HIG and RMCF is -0.21 over 3 years, -0.31 over 1 year and -0.13 over 5 years.

Is RMCF a good diversifier for HIG?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.21 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.21 mean?

A reading of -0.21 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/hig-vs-rmcf.json

HIG vs RMCF: 3-year weekly correlation -0.21HIG vs RMCF-0.21

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![HIG vs RMCF correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/hig-vs-rmcf.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/hig-vs-rmcf/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: HIG correlations · RMCF correlations