PairBook
HomeHIG › HIG vs MCK

HIG vs MCK: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Hartford (The) (HIG) and McKesson Corporation (MCK) carry a correlation of 0.36, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.36
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.47
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.43
long-run
Ann. covariance
175.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are HIG and MCK?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of HIG and MCK correlate at 0.36, moderate. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.47) runs above the 3-year figure (0.36). Stretching to 5 years gives 0.43, with an annualized covariance of 175.8 %².

Among the 49 assets we track against HIG, MCK ranks #36 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with MCK ahead by 25.4 points (+5.4% versus +30.8%). The rolling one-year correlation moved between 0.16 and 0.49 over the past three years, a moderate range.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
One-year correlation, rolled weekly across the last three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

HIG vs MCK: side by side

HIG (Hartford (The))MCK (McKesson Corporation)
1-year return+5.4%+30.8%
5-year return+127.4%+354.8%
Volatility (ann.)19.5%25.1%
Beta vs S&P 5000.390.16
Max drawdown (3Y)-13.7%-27.2%
Market cap$37.3B$103.8B
P/E (trailing)9.724.0
Dividend yield1.66%0.37%
Sector / categoryFinancialsHealth Care
Lower P/E: HIG 9.7 vs 24.0Higher yield: HIG 1.66% vs 0.37%Smaller drawdown: HIG -13.7% vs -27.2%Higher 5y return: MCK +354.8% vs +127.4%
-6%0%+44%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. HIG · MCK

Year-by-year returns

YearHIGMCK
2022+12.3%+51.8%
2023+8.5%+24.1%
2024+38.5%+23.7%
2025+28.1%+44.5%
2026+0.9%+8.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are HIG and MCK good diversifiers for each other?

A fair diversifier. At 0.36, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

FAQ

What is the correlation between HIG and MCK?

The HIG/MCK correlation stands at 0.36 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.47, 5 years: 0.43), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is MCK a good diversifier for HIG?

A fair diversifier. At 0.36, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

What does a correlation of 0.36 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.36 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/hig-vs-mck.json

HIG vs MCK: 3-year weekly correlation 0.36HIG vs MCK0.36

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![HIG vs MCK correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/hig-vs-mck.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/hig-vs-mck/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: HIG correlations · MCK correlations