PairBook
HomeHCWB › HCWB vs TOPS

HCWB vs TOPS: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, HCW Biologics Inc. (HCWB) and TOP Ships, Inc. (TOPS) carry a correlation of -0.29, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.29
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.58
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.15
long-run
Ann. covariance
-5390.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are HCWB and TOPS?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of HCWB and TOPS correlate at -0.29, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.58) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.29). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.15, with an annualized covariance of -5390.5 %².

Out of 17 assets tracked against HCWB, TOPS lands near the bottom at #17. Over the last 12 months TOPS came out ahead by 5.3 percentage points (-91.2% against -85.9%). Note the risk asymmetry: HCWB runs 3.0 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

HCWB vs TOPS: side by side

HCWB (HCW Biologics Inc.)TOPS (TOP Ships, Inc.)
1-year return-91.2%-85.9%
5-year return-99.7%-99.7%
Volatility (ann.)238.8%78.4%
Beta vs S&P 5001.211.09
Max drawdown (3Y)-99.7%-96.5%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)1.2
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: TOPS -96.5% vs -99.7%
-94%0%+32%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). HCWB · TOPS

Year-by-year returns

YearHCWBTOPS
2022-17.5%-92.4%
2023-36.0%+2.5%
2024-63.6%-61.4%
2025-94.6%-25.2%
2026-45.6%-82.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are HCWB and TOPS good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.29, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between HCWB and TOPS?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between HCWB and TOPS is -0.29 over 3 years, -0.58 over 1 year and -0.15 over 5 years.

Is TOPS a good diversifier for HCWB?

Yes: at -0.29, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.29 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.29 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/hcwb-vs-tops.json

HCWB vs TOPS: 3-year weekly correlation -0.29HCWB vs TOPS-0.29

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![HCWB vs TOPS correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/hcwb-vs-tops.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/hcwb-vs-tops/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: HCWB correlations · TOPS correlations