PairBook
HomeHCA › HCA vs MXL

HCA vs MXL: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, HCA Healthcare (HCA) and MaxLinear, Inc (MXL) carry a correlation of -0.21, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.21
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.32
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.05
long-run
Ann. covariance
-583.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are HCA and MXL?

Over the past 3 years, HCA and MXL moved with a correlation of -0.21, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.32) than the 3-year average (-0.21). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.05, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -583.9 %².

Within HCA's tracked universe of 32 assets, MXL comes in at #27 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: MXL led by 274.7 percentage points, +4.2% for HCA against +278.9% for MXL. Note the risk asymmetry: MXL runs 3.9 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

HCA vs MXL: side by side

HCA (HCA Healthcare)MXL (MaxLinear, Inc)
1-year return+4.2%+278.9%
5-year return+72.5%+19.8%
Volatility (ann.)26.9%105.2%
Beta vs S&P 5000.422.50
Max drawdown (3Y)-33.6%-63.9%
Market cap$90.8B$5.8B
P/E (trailing)14.1
Dividend yield0.70%0.00%
Sector / categoryHealth CareUS Listed
Higher yield: HCA 0.70% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: HCA -33.6% vs -63.9%Higher 5y return: HCA +72.5% vs +19.8%
-13%0%+539%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). HCA · MXL

Year-by-year returns

YearHCAMXL
2022-5.6%-55.0%
2023+13.8%-30.0%
2024+11.8%-16.8%
2025+56.7%-11.9%
2026-9.9%+263.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are HCA and MXL good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.21, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between HCA and MXL?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between HCA and MXL is -0.21 over 3 years, -0.32 over 1 year and -0.05 over 5 years.

Is MXL a good diversifier for HCA?

Yes: at -0.21, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.21 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.21 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/hca-vs-mxl.json

HCA vs MXL: 3-year weekly correlation -0.21HCA vs MXL-0.21

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![HCA vs MXL correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/hca-vs-mxl.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/hca-vs-mxl/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: HCA correlations · MXL correlations