PairBook
HomeHAS › HAS vs MTVA

HAS vs MTVA: Correlation

Hasbro (HAS) and MetaVia Inc. (MTVA) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.16.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.16
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.37
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.11
long-run
Ann. covariance
-896.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are HAS and MTVA?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of HAS and MTVA correlate at -0.16, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.37 versus -0.16 over 3 years. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.11, with an annualized covariance of -896.0 %².

Within HAS's tracked universe of 36 assets, MTVA comes in at #28 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months HAS outperformed by 95.4 percentage points (+19.2% for HAS against -76.2% for MTVA). Note the risk asymmetry: MTVA runs 5.5 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

HAS vs MTVA: side by side

HAS (Hasbro)MTVA (MetaVia Inc.)
1-year return+19.2%-76.2%
5-year return+17.1%-100.0%
Volatility (ann.)31.7%173.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.861.46
Max drawdown (3Y)-40.3%-98.6%
Market cap$13.3B
P/E (trailing)17.1
Dividend yield2.91%0.00%
Sector / categoryConsumer DiscretionaryUS Listed
Higher yield: HAS 2.91% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: HAS -40.3% vs -98.6%Higher 5y return: HAS +17.1% vs -100.0%
-86%0%+51%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). HAS · MTVA

Year-by-year returns

YearHASMTVA
2022-37.9%-98.0%
2023-11.9%-35.6%
2024+14.8%-45.1%
2025+52.5%-62.3%
2026+17.5%-80.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are HAS and MTVA good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.16 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between HAS and MTVA?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.16 over 3 years, with -0.37 over the last year and -0.11 over 5 years.

Is MTVA a good diversifier for HAS?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.16 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.16 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/has-vs-mtva.json

HAS vs MTVA: 3-year weekly correlation -0.16HAS vs MTVA-0.16

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![HAS vs MTVA correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/has-vs-mtva.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/has-vs-mtva/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: HAS correlations · MTVA correlations