PairBook
HomeHALO › HALO vs SWVL

HALO vs SWVL: Correlation

Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. (HALO) and Swvl Holdings Corp (SWVL) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.20.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.20
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.16
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.09
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1019.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are HALO and SWVL?

On 3 years of weekly data the HALO/SWVL correlation comes out at -0.20, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.16 over 1 year against -0.20 over 3. The 5-year figure is -0.09, and annualized covariance runs at -1019.3 %².

Out of 12 assets tracked against HALO, SWVL lands near the bottom at #9. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with HALO ahead by 83.5 points (+46.1% versus -37.4%). Note the risk asymmetry: SWVL runs 2.9 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

HALO vs SWVL: side by side

HALO (Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.)SWVL (Swvl Holdings Corp)
1-year return+46.1%-37.4%
5-year return+154.8%-99.1%
Volatility (ann.)41.5%122.0%
Beta vs S&P 5000.541.20
Max drawdown (3Y)-33.9%-92.3%
Market cap$12.1B
P/E (trailing)31.418.4
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: SWVL 18.4 vs 31.4Smaller drawdown: HALO -33.9% vs -92.3%Higher 5y return: HALO +154.8% vs -99.1%
-61%0%+44%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. HALO · SWVL

Year-by-year returns

YearHALOSWVL
2022+41.5%-98.6%
2023-35.0%-51.1%
2024+29.4%+281.3%
2025+40.8%-70.2%
2026+58.9%+16.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are HALO and SWVL good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.20 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between HALO and SWVL?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.20 over 3 years, with -0.16 over the last year and -0.09 over 5 years.

Is SWVL a good diversifier for HALO?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.20 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.20 mean?

A reading of -0.20 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/halo-vs-swvl.json

HALO vs SWVL: 3-year weekly correlation -0.20HALO vs SWVL-0.20

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![HALO vs SWVL correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/halo-vs-swvl.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/halo-vs-swvl/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: HALO correlations · SWVL correlations