PairBook
HomeHAL › HAL vs XLE

HAL vs XLE: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Halliburton (HAL) and Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLE) carry a correlation of 0.81, a very strong link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.81
very strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.68
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.84
long-run
Ann. covariance
710.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are HAL and XLE?

On 3 years of weekly data the HAL/XLE correlation comes out at 0.81, very strong, meaning they move nearly in lockstep. The past 12 months show a weaker link (0.68) than the 3-year average (0.81). The 5-year figure is 0.84, and annualized covariance runs at 710.9 %².

In HAL's tracked universe of 44 assets, XLE sits right near the top at #2. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months HAL outperformed by 18.8 percentage points (+62.8% for HAL against +44.0% for XLE). The link looks structural: the rolling one-year correlation barely moved, holding between 0.68 and 0.91. One caveat on sizing: HAL is 1.6 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
Rolling one-year correlation of weekly returns over the past three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

HAL vs XLE: side by side

HAL (Halliburton)XLE (Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund)
1-year return+62.8%+44.0%
5-year return+93.6%+206.7%
Volatility (ann.)38.0%23.1%
Beta vs S&P 5000.550.27
Max drawdown (3Y)-54.0%-20.1%
Market cap$29.6B
P/E (trailing)18.0
Dividend yield1.97%2.55%
Expense ratio0.08%
Assets under management$39.2B
Sector / categoryEnergySector ETF
Higher yield: XLE 2.55% vs 1.97%Smaller drawdown: XLE -20.1% vs -54.0%Higher 5y return: XLE +206.7% vs +93.6%

XLE is an Equity Energy fund from State Street Investment Management: $39.2B under management, 22 holdings, a 0.08% expense ratio, a 2.55% trailing dividend yield.

-2%0%+91%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. HAL · XLE

Year-by-year returns

YearHALXLE
2022+74.5%+64.3%
2023-6.5%-0.6%
2024-23.2%+5.6%
2025+7.0%+7.9%
2026+26.7%+41.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Fund exposure

A structural note: 1.71% of XLE is HAL itself, so the fund partly moves with the stock by construction.

Are HAL and XLE good diversifiers for each other?

No. With a correlation of 0.81, HAL and XLE move nearly in lockstep, so holding both adds very little diversification.

FAQ

What is the correlation between HAL and XLE?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between HAL and XLE is 0.81 over 3 years, 0.68 over 1 year and 0.84 over 5 years.

Is XLE a good diversifier for HAL?

No. With a correlation of 0.81, HAL and XLE move nearly in lockstep, so holding both adds very little diversification.

What does a correlation of 0.81 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/hal-vs-xle.json

HAL vs XLE: 3-year weekly correlation 0.81HAL vs XLE0.81

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![HAL vs XLE correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/hal-vs-xle.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/hal-vs-xle/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: HAL correlations · XLE correlations