PairBook
HomeGWH › GWH vs RACE

GWH vs RACE: Correlation

How closely do ESS Tech, Inc. (GWH) and Ferrari N.V. (RACE) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.19, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.19
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.47
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.00
long-run
Ann. covariance
-781.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are GWH and RACE?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of GWH and RACE correlate at -0.19, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.47 versus -0.19 over 3 years. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.00, with an annualized covariance of -781.5 %².

Among the 12 assets we track against GWH, RACE sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #11. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months RACE outperformed by 65.4 percentage points (-76.2% for GWH against -10.8% for RACE). Risk is not evenly split, since GWH carries 3.7 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

GWH vs RACE: side by side

GWH (ESS Tech, Inc.)RACE (Ferrari N.V.)
1-year return-76.2%-10.8%
5-year return-99.8%+98.0%
Volatility (ann.)122.3%32.9%
Beta vs S&P 5001.110.99
Max drawdown (3Y)-98.8%-39.2%
Market cap$72.8B
P/E (trailing)38.2
Dividend yield0.00%0.88%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: RACE 0.88% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: RACE -39.2% vs -98.8%Higher 5y return: RACE +98.0% vs -99.8%
-74%0%+285%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. GWH · RACE

Year-by-year returns

YearGWHRACE
2022-78.8%-16.7%
2023-53.1%+59.1%
2024-65.6%+26.3%
2025-68.0%-12.3%
2026-80.9%+13.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are GWH and RACE good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.19, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between GWH and RACE?

The GWH/RACE correlation stands at -0.19 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.47, 5 years: -0.00), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is RACE a good diversifier for GWH?

Yes: at -0.19, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.19 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.19 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/gwh-vs-race.json

GWH vs RACE: 3-year weekly correlation -0.19GWH vs RACE-0.19

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![GWH vs RACE correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/gwh-vs-race.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/gwh-vs-race/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: GWH correlations · RACE correlations