PairBook
HomeGURE › GURE vs MKC

GURE vs MKC: Correlation

How closely do Gulf Resources, Inc. (GURE) and McCormick & Company (MKC) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.19, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.19
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.28
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.15
long-run
Ann. covariance
-701.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are GURE and MKC?

Over the past 3 years, GURE and MKC moved with a correlation of -0.19, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.28 over 1 year against -0.19 over 3. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.15, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -701.1 %².

By 3-year correlation, MKC places #11 of the 23 assets tracked against GURE. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with MKC ahead by 32.2 points (-52.5% versus -20.3%). One caveat on sizing: GURE is 5.2 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

GURE vs MKC: side by side

GURE (Gulf Resources, Inc.)MKC (McCormick & Company)
1-year return-52.5%-20.3%
5-year return-92.1%-28.5%
Volatility (ann.)137.7%26.5%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.300.24
Max drawdown (3Y)-88.1%-44.3%
Market cap$14.7B
P/E (trailing)9.2
Dividend yield0.00%3.38%
Sector / categoryUS ListedConsumer Staples
Higher yield: MKC 3.38% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: MKC -44.3% vs -88.1%Higher 5y return: MKC -28.5% vs -92.1%
-60%0%+9%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. GURE · MKC

Year-by-year returns

YearGUREMKC
2022-28.6%-12.7%
2023-46.6%-15.7%
2024-65.5%+14.0%
2025-35.1%-8.3%
2026-7.6%-18.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are GURE and MKC good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.19 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between GURE and MKC?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between GURE and MKC is -0.19 over 3 years, -0.28 over 1 year and -0.15 over 5 years.

Is MKC a good diversifier for GURE?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.19 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.19 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.19 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/gure-vs-mkc.json

GURE vs MKC: 3-year weekly correlation -0.19GURE vs MKC-0.19

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![GURE vs MKC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/gure-vs-mkc.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/gure-vs-mkc/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: GURE correlations · MKC correlations