PairBook
HomeGURE › GURE vs L

GURE vs L: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Gulf Resources, Inc. (GURE) and Loews Corporation (L) carry a correlation of -0.21, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.21
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.31
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.10
long-run
Ann. covariance
-480.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are GURE and L?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of GURE and L correlate at -0.21, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.31 over 1 year against -0.21 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.10, with an annualized covariance of -480.6 %².

Within GURE's tracked universe of 23 assets, L comes in at #13 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with L ahead by 66.7 points (-52.5% versus +14.2%). One caveat on sizing: GURE is 8.3 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

GURE vs L: side by side

GURE (Gulf Resources, Inc.)L (Loews Corporation)
1-year return-52.5%+14.2%
5-year return-92.1%+100.1%
Volatility (ann.)137.7%16.6%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.300.33
Max drawdown (3Y)-88.1%-12.2%
Market cap$22.5B
P/E (trailing)13.5
Dividend yield0.00%0.23%
Sector / categoryUS ListedFinancials
Higher yield: L 0.23% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: L -12.2% vs -88.1%Higher 5y return: L +100.1% vs -92.1%
-60%0%+22%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. GURE · L

Year-by-year returns

YearGUREL
2022-28.6%+1.4%
2023-46.6%+19.8%
2024-65.5%+22.1%
2025-35.1%+24.7%
2026-7.6%+4.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are GURE and L good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.21, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between GURE and L?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.21 over 3 years, with -0.31 over the last year and -0.10 over 5 years.

Is L a good diversifier for GURE?

Yes: at -0.21, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.21 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/gure-vs-l.json

GURE vs L: 3-year weekly correlation -0.21GURE vs L-0.21

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![GURE vs L correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/gure-vs-l.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/gure-vs-l/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: GURE correlations · L correlations