PairBook
HomeGTBP › GTBP vs VFC

GTBP vs VFC: Correlation

How closely do GT Biopharma, Inc. (GTBP) and V.F. Corporation (VFC) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.20, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.20
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.10
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.04
long-run
Ann. covariance
-990.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are GTBP and VFC?

On 3 years of weekly data the GTBP/VFC correlation comes out at -0.20, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.10 over 1 year against -0.20 over 3. The 5-year figure is -0.04, and annualized covariance runs at -990.4 %².

VFC is close to the least connected end of GTBP's tracked universe, ranking #9 of 10. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with VFC ahead by 66.8 points (-73.5% versus -6.7%). Risk is not evenly split, since GTBP carries 1.6 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

GTBP vs VFC: side by side

GTBP (GT Biopharma, Inc.)VFC (V.F. Corporation)
1-year return-73.5%-6.7%
5-year return-99.9%-79.1%
Volatility (ann.)90.4%54.9%
Beta vs S&P 5000.761.25
Max drawdown (3Y)-97.1%-63.7%
Market cap$5.4B
P/E (trailing)0.120.1
Dividend yield0.00%12.96%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: GTBP 0.1 vs 20.1Higher yield: VFC 12.96% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: VFC -63.7% vs -97.1%Higher 5y return: VFC -79.1% vs -99.9%
-69%0%+43%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. GTBP · VFC

Year-by-year returns

YearGTBPVFC
2022-71.0%-60.4%
2023-71.2%-28.5%
2024-60.1%+16.6%
2025-74.3%-13.8%
2026-61.6%-23.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are GTBP and VFC good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.20, GTBP and VFC have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between GTBP and VFC?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between GTBP and VFC is -0.20 over 3 years, -0.10 over 1 year and -0.04 over 5 years.

Is VFC a good diversifier for GTBP?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.20, GTBP and VFC have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.20 mean?

A reading of -0.20 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/gtbp-vs-vfc.json

GTBP vs VFC: 3-year weekly correlation -0.20GTBP vs VFC-0.20

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![GTBP vs VFC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/gtbp-vs-vfc.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/gtbp-vs-vfc/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: GTBP correlations · VFC correlations