GSM vs QQQ: Correlation
Ferroglobe PLC (GSM) and Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ) show a weak relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.28.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are GSM and QQQ?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of GSM and QQQ correlate at 0.28, weak. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.36 over 1 year against 0.28 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.28, with an annualized covariance of 290.3 %².
Out of 13 assets tracked against GSM, QQQ lands near the bottom at #10. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with QQQ ahead by 29.6 points (-3.3% versus +26.3%). Note the risk asymmetry: GSM runs 2.7 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
GSM vs QQQ: side by side
| GSM (Ferroglobe PLC) | QQQ (Invesco QQQ Trust) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -3.3% | +26.3% |
| 5-year return | -45.4% | +95.4% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 52.6% | 19.6% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.11 | 1.28 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -53.7% | -22.8% |
| Market cap | – | – |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 1.43% | 0.44% |
| Expense ratio | – | 0.18% |
| Assets under management | – | $452.8B |
| Sector / category | US Listed | ETF · US Growth & Tech |
QQQ is a Large Growth fund from Invesco: $452.8B under management, 104 holdings, a 0.18% expense ratio, a 0.44% trailing dividend yield.
Year-by-year returns
| Year | GSM | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -38.0% | -32.6% |
| 2023 | +69.1% | +54.9% |
| 2024 | -40.9% | +25.6% |
| 2025 | +23.7% | +20.8% |
| 2026 | -12.0% | +17.7% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are GSM and QQQ good diversifiers for each other?
Reasonably. At 0.28, GSM and QQQ keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between GSM and QQQ?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.28 over 3 years, with 0.36 over the last year and 0.28 over 5 years.
Is QQQ a good diversifier for GSM?
Reasonably. At 0.28, GSM and QQQ keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.28 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.28 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/gsm-vs-qqq.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/gsm-vs-qqq/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: GSM correlations · QQQ correlations
