PairBook
HomeGSIW › GSIW vs OMC

GSIW vs OMC: Correlation

Garden Stage Limited - Class A (GSIW) and Omnicom Group (OMC) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.17.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.17
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.19
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-785.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are GSIW and OMC?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of GSIW and OMC correlate at -0.17, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.19) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives n/a, with an annualized covariance of -785.8 %².

Within GSIW's tracked universe of 22 assets, OMC comes in at #9 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: OMC led by 41.0 percentage points, -24.5% for GSIW against +16.5% for OMC. One caveat on sizing: GSIW is 5.7 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

GSIW vs OMC: side by side

GSIW (Garden Stage Limited - Class A)OMC (Omnicom Group)
1-year return-24.5%+16.5%
5-year returnn/a+45.6%
Volatility (ann.)159.9%28.0%
Beta vs S&P 5001.060.76
Max drawdown (3Y)-99.7%-33.3%
Market cap$24.1B
P/E (trailing)237.5
Dividend yield0.00%3.53%
Sector / categoryUS ListedCommunication Services
Higher yield: OMC 3.53% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: OMC -33.3% vs -99.7%
-51%0%+80%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). GSIW · OMC

Year-by-year returns

YearGSIWOMC
2022+15.7%
2023+9.6%
2024-91.5%+2.5%
2025-80.6%-2.6%
2026-41.5%+11.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are GSIW and OMC good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.17 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between GSIW and OMC?

The GSIW/OMC correlation stands at -0.17 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.19, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is OMC a good diversifier for GSIW?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.17 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.17 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.17 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/gsiw-vs-omc.json

GSIW vs OMC: 3-year weekly correlation -0.17GSIW vs OMC-0.17

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![GSIW vs OMC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/gsiw-vs-omc.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/gsiw-vs-omc/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: GSIW correlations · OMC correlations