PairBook
HomeGS › GS vs LICN

GS vs LICN: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Goldman Sachs (GS) and Lichen International Limited - Class A (LICN) carry a correlation of -0.23, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.23
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.03
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-53445.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are GS and LICN?

Over the past 3 years, GS and LICN moved with a correlation of -0.23, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.03) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.23). Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -53445.2 %².

Among the 41 assets we track against GS, LICN sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #38. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with GS ahead by 116.3 points (+41.6% versus -74.7%). Risk is not evenly split, since LICN carries 315.9 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

GS vs LICN: side by side

GS (Goldman Sachs)LICN (Lichen International Limited - Class A)
1-year return+41.6%-74.7%
5-year return+184.1%n/a
Volatility (ann.)27.0%8528.0%
Beta vs S&P 5001.34-80.22
Max drawdown (3Y)-30.9%-98.4%
Market cap$303.1B
P/E (trailing)16.1
Dividend yield1.63%0.00%
Sector / categoryFinancialsUS Listed
Higher yield: GS 1.63% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: GS -30.9% vs -98.4%
-81%0%+61%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). GS · LICN

Year-by-year returns

YearGSLICN
2022-7.9%
2023+15.9%
2024+52.0%-91.0%
2025+56.6%+1484.3%
2026+19.6%-56.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are GS and LICN good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.23, GS and LICN have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between GS and LICN?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between GS and LICN is -0.23 over 3 years, 0.03 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.

Is LICN a good diversifier for GS?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.23, GS and LICN have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.23 mean?

A reading of -0.23 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/gs-vs-licn.json

GS vs LICN: 3-year weekly correlation -0.23GS vs LICN-0.23

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![GS vs LICN correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/gs-vs-licn.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/gs-vs-licn/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: GS correlations · LICN correlations