GROW vs TULP: Correlation
U.S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW) and Bloomia Holdings, Inc. (TULP) show a weak relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.27.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are GROW and TULP?
On 3 years of weekly data the GROW/TULP correlation comes out at 0.27, weak. The past 12 months show a tighter link (0.47) than the 3-year average (0.27). The 5-year figure is 0.15, and annualized covariance runs at 410.8 %².
Among the 11 assets we track against GROW, TULP sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #8. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months GROW outperformed by 83.3 percentage points (+42.9% for GROW against -40.4% for TULP). Risk is not evenly split, since TULP carries 1.9 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
GROW vs TULP: side by side
| GROW (U.S. Global Investors, Inc.) | TULP (Bloomia Holdings, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +42.9% | -40.4% |
| 5-year return | -37.2% | -59.8% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 28.4% | 52.9% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.57 | 0.08 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -32.2% | -53.2% |
| Market cap | – | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 13.4 | – |
| Dividend yield | 2.69% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | GROW | TULP |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -32.6% | -66.2% |
| 2023 | +0.9% | -41.0% |
| 2024 | -10.2% | +5.2% |
| 2025 | +2.9% | -28.9% |
| 2026 | +42.2% | -1.4% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are GROW and TULP good diversifiers for each other?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.27 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between GROW and TULP?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between GROW and TULP is 0.27 over 3 years, 0.47 over 1 year and 0.15 over 5 years.
Is TULP a good diversifier for GROW?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.27 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.27 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.27 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/grow-vs-tulp.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/grow-vs-tulp/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: GROW correlations · TULP correlations
