PairBook
HomeGRNQ › GRNQ vs PANW

GRNQ vs PANW: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Greenpro Capital Corp. (GRNQ) and Palo Alto Networks (PANW) carry a correlation of -0.20, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.20
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.42
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.12
long-run
Ann. covariance
-821.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are GRNQ and PANW?

Over the past 3 years, GRNQ and PANW moved with a correlation of -0.20, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.42 versus -0.20 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.12, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -821.0 %².

Among the 11 assets we track against GRNQ, PANW sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #8. The last year tells two different stories: PANW led by 113.5 percentage points, -9.4% for GRNQ against +104.1% for PANW. Risk is not evenly split, since GRNQ carries 2.3 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

GRNQ vs PANW: side by side

GRNQ (Greenpro Capital Corp.)PANW (Palo Alto Networks)
1-year return-9.4%+104.1%
5-year return-86.5%+400.7%
Volatility (ann.)98.3%42.0%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.501.32
Max drawdown (3Y)-96.4%-36.0%
Market cap$312.0B
P/E (trailing)294.5
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedInformation Technology
Smaller drawdown: PANW -36.0% vs -96.4%Higher 5y return: PANW +400.7% vs -86.5%
-39%0%+141%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. GRNQ · PANW

Year-by-year returns

YearGRNQPANW
2022-82.6%-24.8%
2023+9.3%+111.3%
2024-5.9%+23.4%
2025+66.7%+1.2%
2026-29.5%+107.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are GRNQ and PANW good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.20, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between GRNQ and PANW?

The GRNQ/PANW correlation stands at -0.20 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.42, 5 years: -0.12), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is PANW a good diversifier for GRNQ?

Yes: at -0.20, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.20 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/grnq-vs-panw.json

GRNQ vs PANW: 3-year weekly correlation -0.20GRNQ vs PANW-0.20

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![GRNQ vs PANW correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/grnq-vs-panw.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/grnq-vs-panw/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: GRNQ correlations · PANW correlations