GRF vs VXZ: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Eagle Capital Growth Fund, Inc. (GRF) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) carry a correlation of -0.23, a negative link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are GRF and VXZ?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of GRF and VXZ correlate at -0.23, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (-0.04) than the 3-year average (-0.23). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.13, with an annualized covariance of -113.8 %².
Out of 10 assets tracked against GRF, VXZ lands near the bottom at #9. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with GRF ahead by 25.8 points (+9.7% versus -16.1%).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
GRF vs VXZ: side by side
| GRF (Eagle Capital Growth Fund, Inc.) | VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +9.7% | -16.1% |
| 5-year return | +56.2% | -53.1% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 19.6% | 25.6% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.31 | -1.31 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -17.8% | -36.4% |
| Market cap | – | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 10.5 | – |
| Dividend yield | 8.10% | – |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | GRF | VXZ |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -6.5% | +0.5% |
| 2023 | +14.9% | -44.0% |
| 2024 | +10.3% | -12.7% |
| 2025 | +19.1% | +5.7% |
| 2026 | -1.4% | -10.5% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are GRF and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.23 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between GRF and VXZ?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between GRF and VXZ is -0.23 over 3 years, -0.04 over 1 year and -0.13 over 5 years.
Is VXZ a good diversifier for GRF?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.23 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.23 mean?
A reading of -0.23 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/grf-vs-vxz.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/grf-vs-vxz/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: GRF correlations · VXZ correlations
