PairBook
HomeGRAB › GRAB vs XLC

GRAB vs XLC: Correlation

How closely do Grab Holdings Limited - Class A (GRAB) and Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.55, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.55
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.56
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.38
long-run
Ann. covariance
329.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are GRAB and XLC?

On 3 years of weekly data the GRAB/XLC correlation comes out at 0.55, moderate. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.56 over 1 year against 0.55 over 3. The 5-year figure is 0.38, and annualized covariance runs at 329.0 %².

By 3-year correlation, XLC places #5 of the 17 assets tracked against GRAB. The last year tells two different stories: XLC led by 29.0 percentage points, -27.5% for GRAB against +1.5% for XLC. Risk is not evenly split, since GRAB carries 2.4 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

GRAB vs XLC: side by side

GRAB (Grab Holdings Limited - Class A)XLC (Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund)
1-year return-27.5%+1.5%
5-year return-65.8%+37.5%
Volatility (ann.)37.6%16.0%
Beta vs S&P 5001.410.90
Max drawdown (3Y)-49.3%-18.0%
Market cap$14.7B
P/E (trailing)32.6
Dividend yield0.00%1.32%
Expense ratio0.08%
Assets under management$21.7B
Sector / categoryUS ListedSector ETF
Higher yield: XLC 1.32% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: XLC -18.0% vs -49.3%Higher 5y return: XLC +37.5% vs -65.8%

On the fund side, XLC sits in the Communications category at State Street Investment Management, with $21.7B under management, 24 holdings, a 0.08% expense ratio, a 1.32% trailing dividend yield.

-36%0%+24%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. GRAB · XLC

Year-by-year returns

YearGRABXLC
2022-54.8%-37.6%
2023+4.7%+52.8%
2024+40.1%+34.7%
2025+5.7%+23.1%
2026-28.1%-4.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are GRAB and XLC good diversifiers for each other?

Somewhat, no more. With 0.55 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.

FAQ

What is the correlation between GRAB and XLC?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between GRAB and XLC is 0.55 over 3 years, 0.56 over 1 year and 0.38 over 5 years.

Is XLC a good diversifier for GRAB?

Somewhat, no more. With 0.55 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.

What does a correlation of 0.55 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.55 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/grab-vs-xlc.json

GRAB vs XLC: 3-year weekly correlation 0.55GRAB vs XLC0.55

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![GRAB vs XLC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/grab-vs-xlc.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/grab-vs-xlc/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: GRAB correlations · XLC correlations