GPRK vs LH: Correlation
Geopark Ltd (GPRK) and Labcorp (LH) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.19.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are GPRK and LH?
On 3 years of weekly data the GPRK/LH correlation comes out at -0.19, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.38) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.19). The 5-year figure is -0.04, and annualized covariance runs at -174.6 %².
By 3-year correlation, LH places #8 of the 14 assets tracked against GPRK. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with GPRK ahead by 32.2 points (+54.0% versus +21.8%). Note the risk asymmetry: GPRK runs 2.0 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
GPRK vs LH: side by side
| GPRK (Geopark Ltd) | LH (Labcorp) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +54.0% | +21.8% |
| 5-year return | +1.9% | +36.0% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 43.1% | 21.4% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.41 | 0.33 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -47.8% | -17.4% |
| Market cap | $0.6B | $27.3B |
| P/E (trailing) | 6.8 | 27.8 |
| Dividend yield | 1.16% | 0.86% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | Health Care |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | GPRK | LH |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +39.0% | -24.4% |
| 2023 | -41.5% | +13.8% |
| 2024 | +15.1% | +2.2% |
| 2025 | -16.8% | +10.6% |
| 2026 | +34.0% | +34.8% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are GPRK and LH good diversifiers for each other?
Yes: at -0.19, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
FAQ
What is the correlation between GPRK and LH?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.19 over 3 years, with -0.38 over the last year and -0.04 over 5 years.
Is LH a good diversifier for GPRK?
Yes: at -0.19, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
What does a correlation of -0.19 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.19 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/gprk-vs-lh.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/gprk-vs-lh/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: GPRK correlations · LH correlations