PairBook
HomeGPN › GPN vs SONM

GPN vs SONM: Correlation

How closely do Global Payments (GPN) and DNA X, Inc. (SONM) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.15, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.15
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.16
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.03
long-run
Ann. covariance
-585.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are GPN and SONM?

On 3 years of weekly data the GPN/SONM correlation comes out at -0.15, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.16 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is -0.03, and annualized covariance runs at -585.8 %².

Among the 39 assets we track against GPN, SONM ranks #30 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months GPN outperformed by 76.2 percentage points (+7.0% for GPN against -69.2% for SONM). One caveat on sizing: SONM is 3.0 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

GPN vs SONM: side by side

GPN (Global Payments)SONM (DNA X, Inc.)
1-year return+7.0%-69.2%
5-year return-39.6%-99.6%
Volatility (ann.)35.9%106.4%
Beta vs S&P 5001.220.06
Max drawdown (3Y)-54.0%-98.5%
Market cap$24.5B
P/E (trailing)44.0
Dividend yield1.08%0.00%
Sector / categoryFinancialsUS Listed
Higher yield: GPN 1.08% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: GPN -54.0% vs -98.5%Higher 5y return: GPN -39.6% vs -99.6%
-72%0%+42%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). GPN · SONM

Year-by-year returns

YearGPNSONM
2022-25.9%-53.9%
2023+29.0%+72.9%
2024-11.0%-57.1%
2025-30.1%-94.5%
2026+20.7%+3.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are GPN and SONM good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.15, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between GPN and SONM?

The GPN/SONM correlation stands at -0.15 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.16, 5 years: -0.03), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is SONM a good diversifier for GPN?

Yes: at -0.15, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.15 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.15 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/gpn-vs-sonm.json

GPN vs SONM: 3-year weekly correlation -0.15GPN vs SONM-0.15

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![GPN vs SONM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/gpn-vs-sonm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/gpn-vs-sonm/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: GPN correlations · SONM correlations