GNS vs GRAB: Correlation
Genius Group Limited (GNS) and Grab Holdings Limited - Class A (GRAB) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.39.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are GNS and GRAB?
On 3 years of weekly data the GNS/GRAB correlation comes out at 0.39, moderate. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.41 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is 0.08, and annualized covariance runs at 1704.2 %².
Few assets follow GNS as closely as GRAB, which ranks #3 of 10 tracked partners. The last year tells two different stories: GRAB led by 48.0 percentage points, -75.5% for GNS against -27.5% for GRAB. Risk is not evenly split, since GNS carries 3.1 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
GNS vs GRAB: side by side
| GNS (Genius Group Limited) | GRAB (Grab Holdings Limited - Class A) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -75.5% | -27.5% |
| 5-year return | -99.9% | -65.8% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 116.4% | 37.6% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 2.04 | 1.41 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -99.4% | -49.3% |
| Market cap | – | $14.7B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 32.6 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | GNS | GRAB |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | – | -54.8% |
| 2023 | +100.9% | +4.7% |
| 2024 | -89.6% | +40.1% |
| 2025 | -16.7% | +5.7% |
| 2026 | -66.0% | -28.1% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are GNS and GRAB good diversifiers for each other?
A fair diversifier. At 0.39, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
FAQ
What is the correlation between GNS and GRAB?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.39 over 3 years, with 0.41 over the last year and 0.08 over 5 years.
Is GRAB a good diversifier for GNS?
A fair diversifier. At 0.39, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
What does a correlation of 0.39 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.39 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/gns-vs-grab.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/gns-vs-grab/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: GNS correlations · GRAB correlations
