GMHS vs REBN: Correlation
Gamehaus Holdings Inc. - Class A (GMHS) and Reborn Coffee, Inc. (REBN) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.21.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are GMHS and REBN?
On 3 years of weekly data the GMHS/REBN correlation comes out at -0.21, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at 0.08 versus -0.21 over 3 years. The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at -2888.4 %².
Among the 28 assets we track against GMHS, REBN ranks #17 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with GMHS ahead by 17.7 points (-35.1% versus -52.8%). Risk is not evenly split, since REBN carries 1.9 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
GMHS vs REBN: side by side
| GMHS (Gamehaus Holdings Inc. - Class A) | REBN (Reborn Coffee, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -35.1% | -52.8% |
| 5-year return | n/a | n/a |
| Volatility (ann.) | 86.7% | 162.3% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | -0.16 | 1.65 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -95.8% | -87.3% |
| Market cap | – | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 8.1 | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | GMHS | REBN |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | – | -30.5% |
| 2024 | +8.1% | -63.6% |
| 2025 | -91.6% | -10.2% |
| 2026 | -23.0% | -10.1% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are GMHS and REBN good diversifiers for each other?
Yes: at -0.21, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
FAQ
What is the correlation between GMHS and REBN?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.21 over 3 years, with 0.08 over the last year and n/a over 5 years.
Is REBN a good diversifier for GMHS?
Yes: at -0.21, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
What does a correlation of -0.21 mean?
A reading of -0.21 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/gmhs-vs-rebn.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/gmhs-vs-rebn/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: GMHS correlations · REBN correlations
