GMHS vs HYPR: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Gamehaus Holdings Inc. - Class A (GMHS) and Hyperfine, Inc. (HYPR) carry a correlation of -0.19, a negative link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are GMHS and HYPR?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of GMHS and HYPR correlate at -0.19, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.03) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.19). Stretching to 5 years gives n/a, with an annualized covariance of -1376.7 %².
Among the 28 assets we track against GMHS, HYPR ranks #11 by 3-year correlation. Neither side won the trailing year by much: -35.1% against -31.8%.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
GMHS vs HYPR: side by side
| GMHS (Gamehaus Holdings Inc. - Class A) | HYPR (Hyperfine, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -35.1% | -31.8% |
| 5-year return | n/a | -91.4% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 86.7% | 82.0% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | -0.16 | 1.26 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -95.8% | -73.7% |
| Market cap | – | $0.1B |
| P/E (trailing) | 8.1 | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | GMHS | HYPR |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | – | -88.4% |
| 2023 | – | +33.3% |
| 2024 | +8.1% | -21.4% |
| 2025 | -91.6% | +11.2% |
| 2026 | -23.0% | -13.6% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are GMHS and HYPR good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.19 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between GMHS and HYPR?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.19 over 3 years, with 0.03 over the last year and n/a over 5 years.
Is HYPR a good diversifier for GMHS?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.19 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.19 mean?
Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/gmhs-vs-hypr.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/gmhs-vs-hypr/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: GMHS correlations · HYPR correlations