GME vs VFS: Correlation
How closely do GameStop Corporation (GME) and VinFast Auto Ltd. (VFS) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.37, which is moderate.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are GME and VFS?
Over the past 3 years, GME and VFS moved with a correlation of 0.37, which is moderate. The past 12 months show a weaker link (0.16) than the 3-year average (0.37). Over 5 years the correlation is 0.03, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 1619.3 %².
VFS is one of the assets that tracks GME most closely: it ranks #3 out of the 10 assets we track against GME. The trailing year gives VFS the advantage: -18.9% versus -9.5%, a 9.4-point spread.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
GME vs VFS: side by side
| GME (GameStop Corporation) | VFS (VinFast Auto Ltd.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -18.9% | -9.5% |
| 5-year return | -65.1% | -67.8% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 57.6% | 75.2% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.61 | 1.62 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -63.2% | -97.1% |
| Market cap | $8.2B | $7.4B |
| P/E (trailing) | 13.4 | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | GME | VFS |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -50.2% | +3.2% |
| 2023 | -5.0% | -16.3% |
| 2024 | +78.8% | -51.9% |
| 2025 | -35.9% | -17.1% |
| 2026 | -9.1% | -5.7% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are GME and VFS good diversifiers for each other?
Reasonably. At 0.37, GME and VFS keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between GME and VFS?
The GME/VFS correlation stands at 0.37 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.16, 5 years: 0.03), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is VFS a good diversifier for GME?
Reasonably. At 0.37, GME and VFS keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.37 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.37 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/gme-vs-vfs.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/gme-vs-vfs/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: GME correlations · VFS correlations
