PairBook
HomeGLU › GLU vs SER

GLU vs SER: Correlation

How closely do Gabelli Global Utility (GLU) and Serina Therapeutics, Inc. (SER) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.22, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.22
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.29
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.06
long-run
Ann. covariance
-359.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are GLU and SER?

On 3 years of weekly data the GLU/SER correlation comes out at -0.22, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.29 over 1 year against -0.22 over 3. The 5-year figure is -0.06, and annualized covariance runs at -359.9 %².

SER is close to the least connected end of GLU's tracked universe, ranking #10 of 12. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months GLU outperformed by 65.0 percentage points (+15.5% for GLU against -49.5% for SER). Note the risk asymmetry: SER runs 5.9 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

GLU vs SER: side by side

GLU (Gabelli Global Utility)SER (Serina Therapeutics, Inc.)
1-year return+15.5%-49.5%
5-year return+33.9%-93.1%
Volatility (ann.)16.8%98.4%
Beta vs S&P 5000.45-0.30
Max drawdown (3Y)-17.9%-95.5%
Market cap$0.1B
P/E (trailing)3.9
Dividend yield6.22%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: GLU 6.22% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: GLU -17.9% vs -95.5%Higher 5y return: GLU +33.9% vs -93.1%
-70%0%+24%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. GLU · SER

Year-by-year returns

YearGLUSER
2022-28.1%-49.4%
2023+2.1%-30.3%
2024+23.6%-63.6%
2025+37.9%-61.8%
2026+5.0%+31.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are GLU and SER good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.22, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between GLU and SER?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.22 over 3 years, with -0.29 over the last year and -0.06 over 5 years.

Is SER a good diversifier for GLU?

Yes: at -0.22, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.22 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.22 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/glu-vs-ser.json

GLU vs SER: 3-year weekly correlation -0.22GLU vs SER-0.22

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![GLU vs SER correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/glu-vs-ser.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/glu-vs-ser/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: GLU correlations · SER correlations