PairBook
HomeGL › GL vs IZM

GL vs IZM: Correlation

Globe Life (GL) and ICZOOM Group Inc. - Class A (IZM) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.52.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.52
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.07
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-2941.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are GL and IZM?

Over the past 3 years, GL and IZM moved with a correlation of -0.52, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at -0.07 versus -0.52 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -2941.5 %².

IZM is close to the least connected end of GL's tracked universe, ranking #29 of 30. The last year tells two different stories: GL led by 116.3 percentage points, +26.1% for GL against -90.2% for IZM. One caveat on sizing: IZM is 4.5 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

GL vs IZM: side by side

GL (Globe Life)IZM (ICZOOM Group Inc. - Class A)
1-year return+26.1%-90.2%
5-year return+91.0%n/a
Volatility (ann.)35.7%159.2%
Beta vs S&P 5000.60-0.15
Max drawdown (3Y)-61.6%-99.5%
Market cap$13.5B
P/E (trailing)11.72.5
Dividend yield0.68%0.00%
Sector / categoryFinancialsUS Listed
Lower P/E: IZM 2.5 vs 11.7Higher yield: GL 0.68% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: GL -61.6% vs -99.5%
-91%0%+33%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. GL · IZM

Year-by-year returns

YearGLIZM
2022+29.7%
2023+1.8%
2024-7.5%-83.8%
2025+26.5%+50.3%
2026+26.5%-90.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are GL and IZM good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.52, GL and IZM have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between GL and IZM?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between GL and IZM is -0.52 over 3 years, -0.07 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.

Is IZM a good diversifier for GL?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.52, GL and IZM have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.52 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/gl-vs-izm.json

GL vs IZM: 3-year weekly correlation -0.52GL vs IZM-0.52

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![GL vs IZM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/gl-vs-izm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/gl-vs-izm/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: GL correlations · IZM correlations