PairBook
HomeGL › GL vs GRN

GL vs GRN: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Globe Life (GL) and iPath Series B Carbon Exchange-Traded Notes (GRN) carry a correlation of -0.28, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.28
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.08
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.06
long-run
Ann. covariance
-293.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are GL and GRN?

On 3 years of weekly data the GL/GRN correlation comes out at -0.28, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (-0.08) than the 3-year average (-0.28). The 5-year figure is -0.06, and annualized covariance runs at -293.2 %².

Among the 30 assets we track against GL, GRN ranks #22 by 3-year correlation. Over the last 12 months GL came out ahead by 11.4 percentage points (+26.1% against +14.7%).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

GL vs GRN: side by side

GL (Globe Life)GRN (iPath Series B Carbon Exchange-Traded Notes)
1-year return+26.1%+14.7%
5-year return+91.0%+36.8%
Volatility (ann.)35.7%29.5%
Beta vs S&P 5000.600.40
Max drawdown (3Y)-61.6%-40.7%
Market cap$13.5B
P/E (trailing)11.73.5
Dividend yield0.68%0.00%
Sector / categoryFinancialsUS Listed
Lower P/E: GRN 3.5 vs 11.7Higher yield: GL 0.68% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: GRN -40.7% vs -61.6%Higher 5y return: GL +91.0% vs +36.8%
-12%0%+33%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. GL · GRN

Year-by-year returns

YearGLGRN
2022+29.7%-0.1%
2023+1.8%-3.0%
2024-7.5%-7.3%
2025+26.5%+20.3%
2026+26.5%-3.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are GL and GRN good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.28, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between GL and GRN?

The GL/GRN correlation stands at -0.28 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.08, 5 years: -0.06), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is GRN a good diversifier for GL?

Yes: at -0.28, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.28 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/gl-vs-grn.json

GL vs GRN: 3-year weekly correlation -0.28GL vs GRN-0.28

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![GL vs GRN correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/gl-vs-grn.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/gl-vs-grn/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: GL correlations · GRN correlations