PairBook
HomeGJP › GJP vs LW

GJP vs LW: Correlation

Synthetic Fixed-Income Securities, Inc. on behalf of STRATS (GJP) and Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.23.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.23
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.12
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.15
long-run
Ann. covariance
-104.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are GJP and LW?

Over the past 3 years, GJP and LW moved with a correlation of -0.23, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (-0.12) than the 3-year average (-0.23). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.15, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -104.2 %².

Among the 11 assets we track against GJP, LW sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #11. Over the last 12 months GJP came out ahead by 5.9 percentage points (+5.6% against -0.3%). Risk is not evenly split, since LW carries 4.2 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

GJP vs LW: side by side

GJP (Synthetic Fixed-Income Securities, Inc. on behalf of STRATS)LW (Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.)
1-year return+5.6%-0.3%
5-year return+30.4%-6.1%
Volatility (ann.)10.3%43.2%
Beta vs S&P 5000.130.44
Max drawdown (3Y)-5.8%-63.1%
Market cap$7.5B
P/E (trailing)26.6
Dividend yield2.71%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: GJP -5.8% vs -63.1%Higher 5y return: GJP +30.4% vs -6.1%
-31%0%+14%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). GJP · LW

Year-by-year returns

YearGJPLW
2022+4.2%+42.9%
2023+7.1%+22.3%
2024+7.2%-37.0%
2025+5.2%-35.7%
2026+2.9%+34.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are GJP and LW good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.23, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between GJP and LW?

The GJP/LW correlation stands at -0.23 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.12, 5 years: -0.15), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is LW a good diversifier for GJP?

Yes: at -0.23, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.23 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.23 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/gjp-vs-lw.json

GJP vs LW: 3-year weekly correlation -0.23GJP vs LW-0.23

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![GJP vs LW correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/gjp-vs-lw.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/gjp-vs-lw/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: GJP correlations · LW correlations