PairBook
HomeGJO › GJO vs PAVM

GJO vs PAVM: Correlation

How closely do Synthetic Fixed-Income Securities, Inc. on behalf of (GJO) and PAVmed Inc. (PAVM) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.19, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.19
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.22
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.09
long-run
Ann. covariance
-136.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are GJO and PAVM?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of GJO and PAVM correlate at -0.19, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.22) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.09, with an annualized covariance of -136.6 %².

Within GJO's tracked universe of 16 assets, PAVM comes in at #9 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with GJO ahead by 67.5 points (+2.6% versus -64.9%). Note the risk asymmetry: PAVM runs 14.8 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

GJO vs PAVM: side by side

GJO (Synthetic Fixed-Income Securities, Inc. on behalf of)PAVM (PAVmed Inc.)
1-year return+2.6%-64.9%
5-year return+27.3%-99.8%
Volatility (ann.)6.9%102.0%
Beta vs S&P 5000.021.05
Max drawdown (3Y)-3.2%-98.1%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: GJO -3.2% vs -98.1%Higher 5y return: GJO +27.3% vs -99.8%
-65%0%+14%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. GJO · PAVM

Year-by-year returns

YearGJOPAVM
2022+1.6%-80.5%
2023+10.3%-42.8%
2024+5.2%-84.8%
2025+5.6%-64.8%
2026+1.4%-23.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are GJO and PAVM good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.19 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between GJO and PAVM?

The GJO/PAVM correlation stands at -0.19 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.22, 5 years: -0.09), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is PAVM a good diversifier for GJO?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.19 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.19 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.19 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/gjo-vs-pavm.json

GJO vs PAVM: 3-year weekly correlation -0.19GJO vs PAVM-0.19

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![GJO vs PAVM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/gjo-vs-pavm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/gjo-vs-pavm/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: GJO correlations · PAVM correlations