PairBook
HomeGHC › GHC vs VXZ

GHC vs VXZ: Correlation

How closely do Graham Holdings Company (GHC) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.47, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.47
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.39
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.47
long-run
Ann. covariance
-326.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are GHC and VXZ?

Over the past 3 years, GHC and VXZ moved with a correlation of -0.47, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.39 over 1 year against -0.47 over 3. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.47, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -326.1 %².

VXZ is close to the least connected end of GHC's tracked universe, ranking #15 of 16. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months GHC outperformed by 21.3 percentage points (+5.2% for GHC against -16.1% for VXZ).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

GHC vs VXZ: side by side

GHC (Graham Holdings Company)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return+5.2%-16.1%
5-year return+94.6%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)26.8%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.78-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-19.8%-36.4%
Market cap$4.8B
P/E (trailing)9.2
Dividend yield0.63%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: GHC -19.8% vs -36.4%Higher 5y return: GHC +94.6% vs -53.1%
-16%0%+9%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. GHC · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearGHCVXZ
2022-3.0%+0.5%
2023+16.6%-44.0%
2024+26.3%-12.7%
2025+27.0%+5.7%
2026+4.5%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are GHC and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.47 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between GHC and VXZ?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.47 over 3 years, with -0.39 over the last year and -0.47 over 5 years.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for GHC?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.47 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.47 mean?

A reading of -0.47 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ghc-vs-vxz.json

GHC vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.47GHC vs VXZ-0.47

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![GHC vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ghc-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ghc-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: GHC correlations · VXZ correlations