PairBook
HomeGH › GH vs VXZ

GH vs VXZ: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Guardant Health, Inc. (GH) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) carry a correlation of -0.25, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.25
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.08
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.27
long-run
Ann. covariance
-417.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are GH and VXZ?

Over the past 3 years, GH and VXZ moved with a correlation of -0.25, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at -0.08 versus -0.25 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.27, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -417.1 %².

Out of 12 assets tracked against GH, VXZ lands near the bottom at #10. The last year tells two different stories: GH led by 181.5 percentage points, +165.4% for GH against -16.1% for VXZ. Note the risk asymmetry: GH runs 2.5 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

GH vs VXZ: side by side

GH (Guardant Health, Inc.)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return+165.4%-16.1%
5-year return+33.5%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)64.9%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.44-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-59.8%-36.4%
Market cap$22.6B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: VXZ -36.4% vs -59.8%Higher 5y return: GH +33.5% vs -53.1%
-16%0%+184%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. GH · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearGHVXZ
2022-72.8%+0.5%
2023-0.6%-44.0%
2024+12.9%-12.7%
2025+234.3%+5.7%
2026+65.0%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are GH and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.25 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between GH and VXZ?

The GH/VXZ correlation stands at -0.25 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.08, 5 years: -0.27), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for GH?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.25 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.25 mean?

A reading of -0.25 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/gh-vs-vxz.json

GH vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.25GH vs VXZ-0.25

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![GH vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/gh-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/gh-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: GH correlations · VXZ correlations