PairBook
HomeGGZ › GGZ vs SW

GGZ vs SW: Correlation

How closely do Gabelli Global Small and Mid Cap Value Trust (The) (GGZ) and Smurfit Westrock (SW) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.53, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.53
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.57
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.54
long-run
Ann. covariance
377.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are GGZ and SW?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of GGZ and SW correlate at 0.53, moderate. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.57 over 1 year against 0.53 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.54, with an annualized covariance of 377.2 %².

Within GGZ's tracked universe of 44 assets, SW comes in at #26 by 3-year correlation. The trailing year gives GGZ the advantage: +21.2% versus +9.7%, a 11.5-point spread. Note the risk asymmetry: SW runs 2.3 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

GGZ vs SW: side by side

GGZ (Gabelli Global Small and Mid Cap Value Trust (The))SW (Smurfit Westrock)
1-year return+21.2%+9.7%
5-year return+37.8%+2.6%
Volatility (ann.)17.8%40.1%
Beta vs S&P 5000.900.92
Max drawdown (3Y)-17.8%-40.5%
Market cap$25.5B
P/E (trailing)5.651.7
Dividend yield0.00%3.57%
Sector / categoryUS ListedMaterials
Lower P/E: GGZ 5.6 vs 51.7Higher yield: SW 3.57% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: GGZ -17.8% vs -40.5%Higher 5y return: GGZ +37.8% vs +2.6%
-28%0%+23%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). GGZ · SW

Year-by-year returns

YearGGZSW
2022-25.5%-28.0%
2023+10.7%+14.1%
2024+5.2%+37.6%
2025+34.9%-26.2%
2026+13.5%+29.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are GGZ and SW good diversifiers for each other?

To a limited degree. At 0.53 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

FAQ

What is the correlation between GGZ and SW?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.53 over 3 years, with 0.57 over the last year and 0.54 over 5 years.

Is SW a good diversifier for GGZ?

To a limited degree. At 0.53 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

What does a correlation of 0.53 mean?

A reading of 0.53 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ggz-vs-sw.json

GGZ vs SW: 3-year weekly correlation 0.53GGZ vs SW0.53

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![GGZ vs SW correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ggz-vs-sw.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ggz-vs-sw/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: GGZ correlations · SW correlations