PairBook
HomeGGZ › GGZ vs RCKY

GGZ vs RCKY: Correlation

Gabelli Global Small and Mid Cap Value Trust (The) (GGZ) and Rocky Brands, Inc. (RCKY) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.50.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.50
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.41
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.48
long-run
Ann. covariance
609.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are GGZ and RCKY?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of GGZ and RCKY correlate at 0.50, moderate. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.41 lands near the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.48, with an annualized covariance of 609.2 %².

Within GGZ's tracked universe of 44 assets, RCKY comes in at #33 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: RCKY led by 29.1 percentage points, +21.2% for GGZ against +50.3% for RCKY. Note the risk asymmetry: RCKY runs 3.8 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

GGZ vs RCKY: side by side

GGZ (Gabelli Global Small and Mid Cap Value Trust (The))RCKY (Rocky Brands, Inc.)
1-year return+21.2%+50.3%
5-year return+37.8%+0.6%
Volatility (ann.)17.8%68.1%
Beta vs S&P 5000.901.66
Max drawdown (3Y)-17.8%-68.0%
Market cap$0.3B
P/E (trailing)5.611.9
Dividend yield0.00%1.40%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: GGZ 5.6 vs 11.9Higher yield: RCKY 1.40% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: GGZ -17.8% vs -68.0%Higher 5y return: GGZ +37.8% vs +0.6%
-9%0%+71%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. GGZ · RCKY

Year-by-year returns

YearGGZRCKY
2022-25.5%-39.5%
2023+10.7%+31.4%
2024+5.2%-22.8%
2025+34.9%+31.9%
2026+13.5%+55.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are GGZ and RCKY good diversifiers for each other?

To a limited degree. At 0.50 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

FAQ

What is the correlation between GGZ and RCKY?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between GGZ and RCKY is 0.50 over 3 years, 0.41 over 1 year and 0.48 over 5 years.

Is RCKY a good diversifier for GGZ?

To a limited degree. At 0.50 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

What does a correlation of 0.50 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.50 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ggz-vs-rcky.json

GGZ vs RCKY: 3-year weekly correlation 0.50GGZ vs RCKY0.50

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![GGZ vs RCKY correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ggz-vs-rcky.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ggz-vs-rcky/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: GGZ correlations · RCKY correlations