PairBook
HomeGFL › GFL vs RSG

GFL vs RSG: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, GFL Environmental Inc. Subordinate voting shares, no par (GFL) and Republic Services (RSG) carry a correlation of 0.47, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.47
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.68
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.51
long-run
Ann. covariance
212.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are GFL and RSG?

Over the past 3 years, GFL and RSG moved with a correlation of 0.47, which is moderate. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.68) runs above the 3-year figure (0.47). Over 5 years the correlation is 0.51, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 212.0 %².

In GFL's tracked universe of 11 assets, RSG sits right near the top at #2. The trailing year gives RSG the advantage: -17.3% versus -5.6%, a 11.7-point spread. Note the risk asymmetry: GFL runs 1.7 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

GFL vs RSG: side by side

GFL (GFL Environmental Inc. Subordinate voting shares, no par)RSG (Republic Services)
1-year return-17.3%-5.6%
5-year return+17.2%+87.9%
Volatility (ann.)27.9%16.2%
Beta vs S&P 5000.470.17
Max drawdown (3Y)-34.9%-22.5%
Market cap$14.8B$67.1B
P/E (trailing)31.0
Dividend yield0.20%1.13%
Sector / categoryUS ListedIndustrials
Higher yield: RSG 1.13% vs 0.20%Smaller drawdown: RSG -22.5% vs -34.9%Higher 5y return: RSG +87.9% vs +17.2%
-30%0%+1%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. GFL · RSG

Year-by-year returns

YearGFLRSG
2022-22.6%-6.2%
2023+18.2%+29.6%
2024+29.3%+23.0%
2025-3.5%+6.4%
2026-4.4%+4.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are GFL and RSG good diversifiers for each other?

Reasonably. At 0.47, GFL and RSG keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between GFL and RSG?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between GFL and RSG is 0.47 over 3 years, 0.68 over 1 year and 0.51 over 5 years.

Is RSG a good diversifier for GFL?

Reasonably. At 0.47, GFL and RSG keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.47 mean?

A reading of 0.47 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/gfl-vs-rsg.json

GFL vs RSG: 3-year weekly correlation 0.47GFL vs RSG0.47

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![GFL vs RSG correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/gfl-vs-rsg.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/gfl-vs-rsg/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: GFL correlations · RSG correlations