PairBook
HomeGF › GF vs OFS

GF vs OFS: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, New Germany Fund, Inc. (The) (GF) and OFS Capital Corporation - Closed End Fund (OFS) carry a correlation of 0.39, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.39
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.51
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.34
long-run
Ann. covariance
278.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are GF and OFS?

On 3 years of weekly data the GF/OFS correlation comes out at 0.39, moderate. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.51) runs above the 3-year figure (0.39). The 5-year figure is 0.34, and annualized covariance runs at 278.0 %².

OFS is close to the least connected end of GF's tracked universe, ranking #10 of 14. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months GF outperformed by 50.2 percentage points (+2.8% for GF against -47.4% for OFS). Note the risk asymmetry: OFS runs 1.6 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

GF vs OFS: side by side

GF (New Germany Fund, Inc. (The))OFS (OFS Capital Corporation - Closed End Fund)
1-year return+2.8%-47.4%
5-year return-16.5%-31.5%
Volatility (ann.)20.9%34.0%
Beta vs S&P 5000.760.69
Max drawdown (3Y)-18.1%-67.0%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)3.4
Dividend yield1.29%23.22%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: OFS 23.22% vs 1.29%Smaller drawdown: GF -18.1% vs -67.0%Higher 5y return: GF -16.5% vs -31.5%
-63%0%+10%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). GF · OFS

Year-by-year returns

YearGFOFS
2022-42.2%+3.3%
2023+11.7%+29.9%
2024-10.0%-20.2%
2025+48.3%-31.6%
2026+3.9%-14.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are GF and OFS good diversifiers for each other?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.39 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between GF and OFS?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between GF and OFS is 0.39 over 3 years, 0.51 over 1 year and 0.34 over 5 years.

Is OFS a good diversifier for GF?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.39 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.39 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.39 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/gf-vs-ofs.json

GF vs OFS: 3-year weekly correlation 0.39GF vs OFS0.39

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![GF vs OFS correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/gf-vs-ofs.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/gf-vs-ofs/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: GF correlations · OFS correlations