GERN vs LSF: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Geron Corporation (GERN) and Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF) carry a correlation of 0.48, a moderate link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are GERN and LSF?
On 3 years of weekly data the GERN/LSF correlation comes out at 0.48, moderate. The past 12 months show a weaker link (0.18) than the 3-year average (0.48). The 5-year figure is 0.37, and annualized covariance runs at 5637.8 %².
In GERN's tracked universe of 11 assets, LSF sits right near the top at #2. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with GERN ahead by 41.1 points (+8.5% versus -32.6%). Risk is not evenly split, since LSF carries 2.9 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
GERN vs LSF: side by side
| GERN (Geron Corporation) | LSF (Laird Superfood, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +8.5% | -32.6% |
| 5-year return | +6.2% | -79.5% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 64.0% | 183.4% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.34 | 1.17 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -79.0% | -79.9% |
| Market cap | $1.0B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | GERN | LSF |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +98.4% | -93.6% |
| 2023 | -12.8% | +8.3% |
| 2024 | +67.8% | +765.9% |
| 2025 | -62.7% | -71.8% |
| 2026 | +15.9% | +74.8% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are GERN and LSF good diversifiers for each other?
A fair diversifier. At 0.48, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
FAQ
What is the correlation between GERN and LSF?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.48 over 3 years, with 0.18 over the last year and 0.37 over 5 years.
Is LSF a good diversifier for GERN?
A fair diversifier. At 0.48, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
What does a correlation of 0.48 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.48 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/gern-vs-lsf.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/gern-vs-lsf/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: GERN correlations · LSF correlations
