GEO vs MQ: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Geo Group Inc (The) REIT (GEO) and Marqeta, Inc. (MQ) carry a correlation of -0.34, a negative link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are GEO and MQ?
On 3 years of weekly data the GEO/MQ correlation comes out at -0.34, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at -0.00 versus -0.34 over 3 years. The 5-year figure is -0.16, and annualized covariance runs at -918.5 %².
MQ is close to the least connected end of GEO's tracked universe, ranking #10 of 11. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months GEO outperformed by 92.1 percentage points (+56.7% for GEO against -35.4% for MQ).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
GEO vs MQ: side by side
| GEO (Geo Group Inc (The) REIT) | MQ (Marqeta, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +56.7% | -35.4% |
| 5-year return | +328.4% | -85.0% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 62.4% | 43.5% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.22 | 0.49 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -62.5% | -53.3% |
| Market cap | $4.3B | $1.7B |
| P/E (trailing) | 15.5 | 180.1 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | GEO | MQ |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +41.3% | -64.4% |
| 2023 | -1.1% | +14.2% |
| 2024 | +158.4% | -45.7% |
| 2025 | -42.4% | +25.3% |
| 2026 | +102.2% | -14.7% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are GEO and MQ good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.34 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between GEO and MQ?
The GEO/MQ correlation stands at -0.34 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.00, 5 years: -0.16), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is MQ a good diversifier for GEO?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.34 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.34 mean?
Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/geo-vs-mq.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/geo-vs-mq/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: GEO correlations · MQ correlations
