PairBook
HomeGCTK › GCTK vs TULP

GCTK vs TULP: Correlation

How closely do GlucoTrack, Inc. (GCTK) and Bloomia Holdings, Inc. (TULP) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.25, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.25
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.48
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.00
long-run
Ann. covariance
-2329.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are GCTK and TULP?

Over the past 3 years, GCTK and TULP moved with a correlation of -0.25, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.48) than the 3-year average (-0.25). Over 5 years the correlation is 0.00, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -2329.8 %².

Among the 10 assets we track against GCTK, TULP sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #10. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with TULP ahead by 53.2 points (-93.6% versus -40.4%). One caveat on sizing: GCTK is 3.3 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

GCTK vs TULP: side by side

GCTK (GlucoTrack, Inc.)TULP (Bloomia Holdings, Inc.)
1-year return-93.6%-40.4%
5-year return-100.0%-59.8%
Volatility (ann.)174.3%52.9%
Beta vs S&P 5001.740.08
Max drawdown (3Y)-100.0%-53.2%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)0.3
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: TULP -53.2% vs -100.0%Higher 5y return: TULP -59.8% vs -100.0%
-94%0%+117%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. GCTK · TULP

Year-by-year returns

YearGCTKTULP
2022-66.2%-66.2%
2023-81.4%-41.0%
2024-71.5%+5.2%
2025-99.1%-28.9%
2026-92.6%-1.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are GCTK and TULP good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.25, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between GCTK and TULP?

The GCTK/TULP correlation stands at -0.25 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.48, 5 years: 0.00), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is TULP a good diversifier for GCTK?

Yes: at -0.25, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.25 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/gctk-vs-tulp.json

GCTK vs TULP: 3-year weekly correlation -0.25GCTK vs TULP-0.25

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![GCTK vs TULP correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/gctk-vs-tulp.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/gctk-vs-tulp/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: GCTK correlations · TULP correlations