PairBook
HomeGCMG › GCMG vs VXZ

GCMG vs VXZ: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, GCM Grosvenor Inc. (GCMG) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) carry a correlation of -0.35, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.35
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.30
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.35
long-run
Ann. covariance
-253.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are GCMG and VXZ?

Over the past 3 years, GCMG and VXZ moved with a correlation of -0.35, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.30 lands near the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.35, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -253.7 %².

Out of 10 assets tracked against GCMG, VXZ lands near the bottom at #10. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months GCMG outperformed by 25.3 percentage points (+9.2% for GCMG against -16.1% for VXZ).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

GCMG vs VXZ: side by side

GCMG (GCM Grosvenor Inc.)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return+9.2%-16.1%
5-year return+52.8%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)28.2%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.76-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-31.3%-36.4%
Market cap$0.8B
P/E (trailing)25.8
Dividend yield3.54%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: GCMG -31.3% vs -36.4%Higher 5y return: GCMG +52.8% vs -53.1%
-24%0%+12%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. GCMG · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearGCMGVXZ
2022-24.0%+0.5%
2023+24.6%-44.0%
2024+43.0%-12.7%
2025-4.3%+5.7%
2026+23.5%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are GCMG and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.35, GCMG and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between GCMG and VXZ?

The GCMG/VXZ correlation stands at -0.35 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.30, 5 years: -0.35), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for GCMG?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.35, GCMG and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.35 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.35 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/gcmg-vs-vxz.json

GCMG vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.35GCMG vs VXZ-0.35

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![GCMG vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/gcmg-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/gcmg-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: GCMG correlations · VXZ correlations