PairBook
HomeGCL › GCL vs NIVF

GCL vs NIVF: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, GCL Global Holdings Ltd (GCL) and NewGenIvf Group Limited - Class A (NIVF) carry a correlation of -0.37, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.37
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.45
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.37
long-run
Ann. covariance
-25464.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are GCL and NIVF?

On 3 years of weekly data the GCL/NIVF correlation comes out at -0.37, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at 0.45 versus -0.37 over 3 years. The 5-year figure is -0.37, and annualized covariance runs at -25464.5 %².

Among the 10 assets we track against GCL, NIVF sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #8. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months GCL outperformed by 18.9 percentage points (-81.0% for GCL against -99.9% for NIVF). One caveat on sizing: NIVF is 9.3 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

GCL vs NIVF: side by side

GCL (GCL Global Holdings Ltd)NIVF (NewGenIvf Group Limited - Class A)
1-year return-81.0%-99.9%
5-year return-93.2%-100.0%
Volatility (ann.)85.9%800.3%
Beta vs S&P 5000.215.34
Max drawdown (3Y)-96.7%-100.0%
Market cap$0.1B
P/E (trailing)0.0
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: GCL -96.7% vs -100.0%Higher 5y return: GCL -93.2% vs -100.0%
-100%0%+8%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. GCL · NIVF

Year-by-year returns

YearGCLNIVF
2023+6.1%+6.9%
2024+6.9%-96.3%
2025-90.7%-99.3%
2026-36.9%-98.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are GCL and NIVF good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.37 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between GCL and NIVF?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between GCL and NIVF is -0.37 over 3 years, 0.45 over 1 year and -0.37 over 5 years.

Is NIVF a good diversifier for GCL?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.37 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.37 mean?

A reading of -0.37 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/gcl-vs-nivf.json

GCL vs NIVF: 3-year weekly correlation -0.37GCL vs NIVF-0.37

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![GCL vs NIVF correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/gcl-vs-nivf.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/gcl-vs-nivf/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: GCL correlations · NIVF correlations